HMRC typically responds to an SEIS or EIS advance assurance application in around four to six weeks. The timetable belongs entirely to HMRC — no adviser controls it. Add one to four weeks if HMRC comes back with questions, which it frequently does, and allow three days to two weeks of preparation before submitting. Apply at least eight weeks before your target close.
Written by Godwin Pinto ACA (ICAI), member of ICPA, founder of AccTek and formerly of PwC.
The wait founders actually experience is longer than the HMRC review, because most of the elapsed time sits either side of it.
| Stage | Typical duration | Who controls it |
|---|---|---|
| Incorporation to UTR arriving | 1–2 weeks | HMRC |
| Getting named investors to a credible schedule | Highly variable | You |
| Assembling the document pack | 3 days – 2 weeks | You |
| Preparing and submitting the application | 2 working days with AccTek | Your adviser |
| HMRC review | 4–6 weeks | HMRC |
| Follow-up questions, if any | 1–4 weeks | Both |
| Realistic total from a standing start | 7–12 weeks |
The eight-week rule of thumb assumes your company is already incorporated with a UTR and your investors are lined up. If you are starting from incorporation, plan for closer to twelve.
Advance assurance is a discretionary, non-statutory service. HMRC is not obliged to provide it, there is no statutory deadline for a response, and there is no right of appeal against the outcome. Any firm advertising a guaranteed clearance in a fixed number of days is promising something that is not theirs to give.
What an adviser genuinely controls is the preparation and submission. AccTek turns a complete information pack into a submitted application in two working days. Everything after that is HMRC’s timetable.
There is no formal expiry date. An advance assurance is given on the facts you presented, and it remains meaningful for as long as those facts still describe your raise.
It stops being reliable when the round changes materially:
In practice most investors treat an assurance more than nine to twelve months old as stale and will ask whether anything has changed. If the answer is yes, go back to HMRC rather than rely on it. Non-disclosure invalidates the assurance entirely, which is worse than a refusal because you may not discover it until investors are trying to claim.
No — the review timetable is the same, and a single application can cover both schemes. What differs is the preparation. EIS applications more often generate follow-up questions because there is more to test: the seven-year rule running from first commercial sale, the group employee and gross-asset position, and knowledge-intensive status where claimed. If your EIS position is borderline on age or size, budget for the follow-up round rather than hoping to avoid it.
Three things move the total materially, and all three are on your side of the line:
Raising on SEIS or EIS? AccTek prepares and submits advance assurance applications on a two-working-day turnaround from complete information, and handles the SEIS1 filing and SEIS3 certificates afterwards. Book a free consultation or get an instant quote.
General information for UK founders based on SEIS and EIS rules for the 2026/27 tax year and HMRC’s published guidance, current at the date of writing. Advance assurance is discretionary and non-statutory, and tax reliefs depend on individual circumstances. This is not tax advice — speak to an accountant about your specific position. Official guidance: applying for advance assurance. AccTek Ltd is independent and is not affiliated with HMRC or GOV.UK.
Godwin Pinto ACA (ICAI) is the founder of AccTek and a member of ICPA, with 20+ years of experience in accounting and tax for contractors, startups and SMEs. Previously at PwC.
AccTek is a member firm of the Institute of Certified Practising Accountants (ICPA). Our accountants have a wide range of qualifications and accreditations from trusted professional bodies such as the AAT, ICPA, and ACCA.